1.
That the Taj Mahal originated
as a temple -The inscription in Sanskrit has 34 stanzas of which stanzas 25,26
and 34 being relevant to our topic are reproduced as translation. Translated,
these means:”He (King Parmardi Dev or on his behalf his minister Salakshan)
raised a palace which had inside it the idol of Lord Vishnu whose feet the king
used to touch with his (bowed) head.
2.
That “Similarly the King also had
constructed this temple,(dedicated) to the God who bears the crescent on His
(fore)head, made of crystal white stone. Consecrated in that (magnificent)
temple the lord (was so pleased that He) never thought of repairing to His
(Himalayan) abode on mount Kailas. The inscription found at Mauja Bateshwar,
near Agra is at present in the Lucknow Museum.It is of the King Paramardi Dev
dated Vikram Samvat 1212, Ashwin (month),5th day of the bright lunar
fortnight. It has in all 34 stanzas which describe the origin of the
Chandratreya (regal) dynasty and its important rulers. The inscription was
found embedded in a mound at Bateshwar .It was later deposited in the Lucknow
Museum by General Cunnigham, where it still is. The two beautiful marble
temples which King Paramardi Dev had raised, one for Lord Vishnu and the other
for Lord Shiva were subsequently desecrated during Invader invasions. Some
clever (farsighted) person has this inscription ,concerning these
temples,buried in a mound. It remained buried for many years until1900 A.D.
when during excavations it was discovered by General Cunnigham. The Shiva
(Chandramauleeshwar) temple is obviuosly the Taj Mahal for the following
reasons:
Taj Mahal is scrawled over with 14 chapters
of the Koran.
3.
That the age of the original stone of
the Taj Mahal and the age of the Koran scrawled-stone are certainly different
and which could be ascertain scientifically. No where is there even the
slightest or remotest elusion in that Islamic overwriting stating Shahjahan’s
authorship of the Taj. Had Shahjahan been the builder of Taj Mahal, naturally
some words would have been scrawled there. When koranic lettering has been
forged on the walls of Taj Mahal, then why not the name of Mumtaz in whose
memory it was stated to be built.
4.
That it is mentioned by the
inscriber, Amanat Khan Shirazi himself in an inscription on the building that
Shahjahan, far from building the marvel Tej, only disfigured it with black
lettering. A clue to that tampering by Shahjahan is found on pages 216-217,
Vol. IV of Archaeological Survey of India Reports, published in 1874, stating
that a .“great square black basaltic pillar which, with the base and capital of
another similar………..now in the grounds of the Museum at Agra……………….it is well
known, one stood in the garden of Taj Mahal.” The true copy of the photographs
deplicting the different monument with tempered representation having deceptive
indintity proclaiming as Mughal constriction as exhibited in the photographs
are Annexure no.18
5.
That there was also a Sanskrit
inscription dated 1155 A. D. in the Taj Mahal which speaks conclusively that it
was a Hindu Temple, which was subsequently wrongly termed as Bateshwar
inscription, now preserved at the top floor of the Lucknow Museum.
6.
That despite such staggering
evidence the respondent authorities have been guilty of Tomin the Taj Mahal as
a marble creation of Shahjahan and thereby creating and misleading the world
for over a century. All of them have also been making illegal gains through
their deceitful activities by being paid huge sums for their books, articles,
news reports, broadcasts, and telecasts.
7.
That Archaeological Survey of
India is guilty of charging high entrance fee from thousands of visitors every
day from all over the world for over a century purveying through its licensed
guides concocted details about Shahjahan’s take authorship of the Taj Mahal and
through Archaeological Survey of India notices in Hindi, Urdu and English on
three stone plaques displayed at the Tajmahal entrance declaring that Shahjahan
raised the monument from 1631 to 1653 A. D.
8.
That the authorities are guilty
of giving mis-information and dis-information all over the world for over a
century. The enormity of that academic crime affecting the whole world has
caused a deep injury and prejudice to the human population of the world. The
national motto of our country is “Satyameva Jayate“ (Truth alone triumphs).
That In that context the blatant lie that the Archaeological Survey of India
has been propagating to the entire academic and tourist world is a matter of
national sham and a serious concern to all.
9.
That there is no valid reason why
Anglo-Invader school should not be able to produce even a single document
pertaining to the Invader claims to the fort. Had the claims been true such
documents should have been available in plenty because when the British deposed
the Mogul emperor they preserved and carefully classified all the documents
they seized form the mogul archives. Those records contain hardly anything but
letters. That when the Anglo-Invader school is unable to produce even a single
document in support of its claim any law court would draw an a priori adverse
inference.
10.
That even then we claim no special
advantage form this fundamental weakness in the case of the respondent
Anglo-Invader school. In ordinary life, there are very many occasions when
documents are not available on either side and yet there is overwhelming
circumstantial evidence on the basis of which the court can come to a clear
judgement over the rival claims. It is such circumstantial evidence which we
propose to lay before the bar and bench of learned public opinion:
11.
That according to the British historian
Keene, Agra fort has been in existence from the pre-Christian era. Ancient
Hindu kings like Ashok (3rd Century B.C.) and Kanishka (1st
Century B.C.) had lived in that fort. That same fort is again referred to by
the Persian poet-historian Salman, in the 11th century A.D.. Early
in that century when the Hindu king Jaipal ruled over Agra. The fort suffered
its first Invader raid under the invader Mahmud of Ghazni.Thereafter some
chauvinistic Islamic accounts vaguely claim that the Invader sultan Sikandar
Lodi demolished the Hindu fort. That claim has been found to be baseless. A few
years later another vague claim is made by some other mediaeval Invader faltterers
that sultan Salim Shah Sur either destroyed the Hindu fort or Sikandar Lodi’s
fort and built his own fort at exactly the same place or some other place. Even
the claim has been found to be fraudulent because no trace is found of the fort
that Salim Shah Suri is said to have built. Invader history is replete with
such fraudulent claims, according to the late British historian Sir H.M.
Elliot.
12.
That an English visitor, Peter Mundy who was
in India only for about a year after Mumtaz’s death mentions the Taj Mahal as
one of the most spectacular buildings. Thus Shahjahan’s sacrilege of the Hindu
Taj temple-palace by misusing it as an Islamic graveyard ought to be rectified
by removing Arjumand Banu’s remains,if they really are in the Taj Mahal, to her
original grave, still existing in
Burhanpur. The garden pavilion of an Hindu mansion in Burhanpur (about 600
miles south west of Agra) where Mumtaz was buried in 1631 A.D. after her death
in her 14th delivery during 18 years of married life. Shahjahan
Mumtaz had encamped in the adjoining Hindu palace during a north south journey
when Mumtaz died.
13.
That
the ground plan of the orthodox Vedic octagonal Tejomahalaya shrine in Agra
where Mumtaz’s exhumed body is supposed to have been interred again. Why this
sacrilege? An aerial view. The white marble Tejomahalaya framed by four towers
at its plinth-corners on the south bank of the sacred Yamuna river. Two
identical red stone buildings (each with three marble domes) facing the marble
edifice from the east and west were meant to be reception pavilions for royal
or religious congregations. The central marble building and the flanking red
stone buildings are all seven storied with octagonal features, which is a Vedic
specialty. Seven storied octagonal buildings are mentioned even in Ramayanic
description of Ayodhya. A meticulous count will reveal 33 arches in the marble
plinth seen in front in between the two towers on the left and the right. Since
the marble platform is a square the breadth too has 33 arches consequently the
marble plinth itself encloses 33x 33=1089 rooms That is the ground floor. Above
it on either side of the lofty entrance arch may be seen vaulted arches on two
levels one above the other, which constitutes two more stories in marble.
14.
That
the outer western gateway leading to the spacious parking area for visitors’
vehicles lined by arcaded red stone verandahs with rooms for shopkeepers
selling their wares. The entire parking area is lined by such shopping arcades
which Tavernier describes as bazar of six courts. The western gateway has
assumed importance in modern times because the main bus depot and railway
stations of the populace, bustling Agra city lies in that direction. In olden
days it was the elevated gateway at the left which used, to be the main
entrance of the Tajganj alias Tajganj township. The Tejomahalaya shopping
arcade has had at its outer eastern and western corners, flanking the Shree
gate, two other subsidiary sentinel-temples. This octagonal pavilion with a
white dome in the southwest corner bearing the inverted lotus cap and straight
Vedic pinnacle pitcher shaft is one of them. But alas, since Shahjahan’s time
the sacred sanctum has an Islamic cenotaph attributed to an harem-maid
Satunnisa Khanam. But since no name is inscribed on it that seems to be an
inspired canard explaining away the desecration of the Hindu shrine.
15.
That the interior of the multi-storied
vaulted entrance gate leading first to the rectangular garden and then to the
wonder marble edifice at the far end. The temple palace management staff used
to work on both floors on various assigned duties. The carved decorative red
stone bunting around the interior and exterior of this gateway, about knee-high
from the floor, if minutely observed turns out to be an ingenious running chain
of three-in-one Ganesh images, two in profile on the flanks and one with a
frontal facing in the middle. The marble Taj Mahal has identical vaulted lofty
archways in all the four directions. Their temple décor was chiseled away and
Koranic extracts were improvised to fill the cavities. Close look at the marble
stone frames around the vertical and horizontal Koranic passages to notice the
patches of dissimilar shapes and tints of marble used. Cobras lined up above a
string of inlaid temple bells pattern form the upper border of the Taj Mahal.
Both cobras and bells have sacred associations in Vedic spiritual lore.
16.
That the gateway at which entry tickets are
issued, is decorated both inside and out, at the knee level with a bunting
depicting such ingeneous three-in-one Ganesh caricatures; two in profile on the
flanks enclosing a frontal one in the middle. The arches in the marble plinth
and the rectangular ventilator above each one of them,(allowing light and air
to the 1089 chambers inside the plinth)may be minutely observed to have been
sealed with marble slabs.
17.
That the seven arches at the bottom enclose
the stairs, which lead to the top of the marble plinth symmetrically from the
right and left. The Nandi (Lord Shiva ‘s Bull) occupied the spot where the
person clad in white robes is seen standing facing the entrance, before it was
uprooted at Shahjahan’s orders. That spot was patched up later with inferior
reddish slabs. There is trident shaped designs in inlay filigree at the two
upper corners of the entrance and the trident shaped red lotus bud at the apex
of the arch.
18.
That the Koranic stones fixed vertically and
horizontally along such lofty arches on all four sides were improvised to fill
up gaping cavities left after digging out idols of Vedic deities and Sanskrit
extracts. We arrive at the above conclusion because (1) a close inspection of
the marble frames enclosing the Koranic extracts reveal patches of marble of
different shapes and tints (2) The Koranic extracts are random, haphazard out
of sequence and incomplete (3) On hot days with the visitor’s feet burning on
the marble plinth a fierce sun beating down on the head and the eyes burning
with intense sunlight radiated by the white marble sheen even a devout Invader
knowing Arabic won’t have the heart or even the steady head or patience to
crane and strain his eyes and neck alternately vertically and horizontally to
make any head or tail of that message of Allah. A close-up of the upper part of
a minaret. The galleries rest on snake-shape brackets, which is a distinct
Hindu architectural trait. Mumtaz’s tomb in the crypt (basement). The pavement
patched up with marble slabs of varying sizes and tints indicating that the
Shivling here has either been replaced by the cenotaph or is covered up by it.
19.
That after one enters the lofty arch from
the marble platform one-steps onto spacious halls which form a perambulatory
passage all around the central octagonal sanctum. That sanctum too has
entrances on all four sides. But only the south entrance has been kept open
since Shahjahan’s time. All these outer and inner entrances had silver doors,
which are common to all renowned Hindu (Vedic) shrines. Those were uprooted and
ranged on the outer marble plinth before being spirited away to Shahjahan’s
Mogul treasury. European visitors to the shrine around 1631 A.D. noticing the
uprooted costly fixtures such as silver doors ranged on the marble platform
misunderstood them to have been ordered by Shahjahan to be used in the
building. Contrarily the thousands of labourers rounded up from the by lanes of
Agra city under threats of dire consequences were forced to toil gratis to
uproot all the costly fixtures such as the gem studded gold railings (around
the Shivaling), silver doors, precious stones stuffed in the marble lattices
and the golden pitcher dripping water on the Shivlinga, and transport them to
the mogul treasury. Notice the framed decorative panels to the left and right
of the doorway. They depict embossed OM
shaped Dhatura flowers and conchshell- type foliage. The panel at the left has
the sacred conchshell design. The right side panel depicts a plant with flowers
shaped like the sacred Vedic chant (OM).
20.
That Mumtaz’s cenotaph in the foreground
and subsequent Shahjahan’s cenotaph besides it in the upper marble octagonal
chamber. Notice that both the cenotaphs are highly decorated with inlay work.
Science have been so somnolent for the last 350 and odd years as to allow the
preposterous Shahjahan and Mumtaz legend, stained with carnal love to pass muster in spite of being riddled with
a myriad loopholes disclosed .Around the hook
(from which hangs the chain) is a sketch in concentric circles. In the
smallest innermost circle are arrows symbolizing the eight surface directions.
Around it is another circle of 16 serpents looking down on the Shivling
underneath. Around it is a wider circle of 32 tridents. Surrounding it is a
bigger circle depicting 64 lotus buds. Even this mathematical progression of
multiples of 8 i.e. 8x2=16x2=32x2=64 is of esoteric Vedic significance and has
no relation with Islam.The preponderating significance of 8 in Vedic tradition
may be judged from terms such as Ashtapailu, Ashtavadhani, Ashtaputra,
Ashtadhatu, Ashtang Ayurved, Mangalashtak and Sastang namaskar.
21.
That the octagonal lattice around the
cenotaph of Mumtaz (which has replaced or covered the sacred Shivling) has in
its upper border a total of 108 pitchers, some rotund and striped and some
oblong like vases. The rotund striped pitcher is seen bathing the Shivaling
underneath with a stream of milk. The decorative flora on the vase and other
parts of the Taj Mahal alias Tejomahalaya is all native to India. Such
decoration in the orange, Vedic colour behooves a Hindu temple or palace but
never a somber Islamic sepulchre.
22.
That a close-up of the gilded pinnacle
rising from the inverted lotus cap of the marble dome .The pinnacle is known as
Kalash in Vedic parlance because of the stack of pitchers which constitute it.
The curvy shaft seen in the upper portion represents the crescent on Lord
Shiva’s forehead. Above it is an oblong pitcher, two mango leaves curving on
either side with a coconut balanced on top. Such a coconut –topped pitcher
represents divinity in Vedic tradition.
23.
That the three domes of the so-called
mosque are a misfit in Islam. Since Islam has only one Allah and one prophet
for who is the third dome? Moreover the qibla (i.e. the prayer niche) is not
aligned to the Kaba in Mecca, as it should be in a genuine mosque. Also when there
are three qiblas instead of one they couldn’t all be aligned to the Kaba at the
same time. And since the twin buildings on the eastern flank is a non-mosque it
automatically follows that its counterpart to the west is also a non-mosque.
Only buildings with the same function and purpose can have an identical design.
24.
That there is staircase and another
symmetrical one at the other end lead down to the storey beneath the marble
platform Tow such staircases (one each at the eastern and western ends) behind
the marble plinth take one to the nether chambers. Visitors may go to the back
of the marble plinth at the eastern or western end and descend down the
staircase because it is open to sky. But at the foot the archaeology department
has set up an iron grill door, which it keeps, locked. Yet one may peep inside
from the iron grill in the upper part of the door. Shahjahan had sealed even
these two staircases. It was the British who opened them. But from Shahjahan’s
time the stories below and above the marble ground floor have been barred to
visitors. We are still following Mogul dictates and Invader secrecy though long
free from Mogul Islamic rule.
25.
That One of the 22 locked rooms in the
secret storey beneath the marble platform of the Taj Mahal, which the
archaeological Survey of India keeps conspiratorially locked to hoodwink the
public. Therefore the public must pressurized the government to open all locked
and sealed chambers in all monuments including the Taj.
26.
That the strips of ancient Hindu
paint are seen on the wall flanking the doorway. The niches above had paintings
of Hindu gods, obviously rubbed off by Invader desecrators. One of the 22
riverside rooms in a secret storey of the Taj Mahal unknown to the public.
Shahjahan far from building the shining marble Taj wantonly disfigured it. Here
he has crudely walled up a doorway. Such imperial Mogul vandalism lies hidden
from the public. This room is in the red stone storey immediately below the
marble platform. Indian history has been turned topsy- in lauding destroyers as
great builders. Therefore Shahjahan should be referred to not as the creator of
Taj but as a plunderer of its costly fixtures and disfigurer of the sublime,
serene beauty of the holy Tejomahalaya.
27.
That many such doorways of
chambers in secret stories underneath the Taj Mahal have been sealed with brick
and lime. Concealed inside could be valuable evidence such as Sanskrit
inscriptions, Hindu idols, the original Hindu model of Taj, the desecrated
Shiva Linga, Hindu scriptures and temple equipment .The Government is
deliberately refraining from opening hundreds of such sealed chambers. Inside
the Taj Mahal for fear of enraging Invaders and exposing the incompetence of
historians worldwide.
28.
That there was the traditional
treasury well of the Hindu temple palace. Treasure chests used to be stacked in
the lower stories. Accountants, cashiers, and treasurers sat in the upper
stories. On being besieged if the building had to be surrendered to the enemy
the treasure chests used to be pushed into the water for salvage later after
recapture. For real research, water should be pumped out of this well to reveal
the evidence that lies at the bottom. This well is inside a tower near the
socalled mosque to the west of the marble Taj. Had the Taj been a mausoleum
this octagonal multi storied well would have been superfluous.
29.
That it has come to the notice
of the petitioner’s institute that there has been the digging of the place
where “gowshala” cow protection shelter was situated .It was revealed that
there are the remains of the temple dig inside the earth and the upper portion
of the temple called as “Amlak” was found to have been hidden inside there. The
official sought the instructions from the officials of the archaeological
department but the matter was subsided on the instructions of the authority as
it may annoy the fundamentalist as a result of which the appeasement policy
adopted by the government for getting the vote of the minority may be adversely
affected. Thus the spot inspections by appointing the team of survey
commissioner to submit Its report may kindly be ordered by this Hon’ble Court
30.
That Visitors to the Taj may notice the
letter “om” woven in bold relief in
embossed flower –designs on the interior marble walls. As one stands poised at
the top of the stairs leading to the basement (to se what they call the ‘real
graves’) one may see on the walls around the upper marble cenotaph chamber, at
chest level, the esoteric sacred Hindu letter ‘om’ woven into embossed marble flower pattern. Pink lotus patterns
on the border of the grilled panels that enclose the cenotaph may also be
noticed.
31.
That a peacock Throne could never have
been ordered by fanatic mediaeval Invader rulers surrounded by even more
fanatic maulvis. Throughout their millennium long rule in India their one
penchant was to break images not to make them. The peacock Throne could only be
a piece of Hindu Palace furniture because traditionally a Hindu throne must
have the effigy of some bird or animal known for its splendor or valour. In
Hindu terminology the very term for a throne is a “Lion Seat (Simhasan).”Hardly
had the project begun, than we are told that by 1635 Shahjahan had amassed such
a plethora of gems and bullion, within seven years of his accession that he did
not know what to do with them. He therefore had a fabulous Peacock Throne
ordered.
32.
That According to Shahjahan’s court
chronicler (PP. 45-46,ibid.), it appears that the peacock Throne was “three
yards long, two and a half yards broad, yards high and set with jewels worth 86
lakh rupees. The canopy had 12 emerald columns. On top of each pillar were two
peacocks thick –set with rubies, diamonds, emeralds, and pearls. The throne cost
ten million Rupees.” “The marble screen enclosing an octagonal area in the
centre of the cenotaph chamber was, according to the Badshahnama placed here in
1642 by Shahjahan …According, however, to competent authority the screen was
placed here by Aurangzeb after he laid his father’s remains there.
33.
That “The basement rooms are
centrally situated as a line of 14 rooms along the face of the Great Basement,
under its terrace; and each of them is connected by a doorway with as inner
lobby running east and west along their entire length. From each end of the
lobby a staircase ascends to the terrace of the Great Basement, where its
entrance closed by red sandstone slabs, lay unsuspected until discovered a few
years ago, the clue being given by a small window overlooking the river in each
of the two easternmost rooms. The rooms, once frescoed and otherwise decorated
being now in darkness and infested by bats, cannot be explored without a torch
or lamp. Whether they originally opened on to a ghat and gave admittance to the
Taj from the river; or being provided with windows, were used as cool resorts
during the heat of the day, cannot now be decided”.
34.
That in the Agra Fort gallery, facing
the Taj, is a tiny glass piece embedded in the wall to mirror the Taj Mahal.
Originators of the Taj legend have conveniently annexed the device to add to
the mesmeric effect of the myth. Embedding tiny, round glass reflectors by
their thousands in arched recesses of palaces and in women’s dresses is a very
common and widespread Rajput practice. Such glass reflectors can still be seen
fixed in numerous ancient palaces in Rajasthan, and continue to be used for decoration
in Rajput women’s dresses. Saracenic architecture, if there be any such should
rather believe in “purdah “ i.e. shrouding or hiding and would never think of
glass reflectors. Mirror –pieces decorated the royal apartments in Agra fort
because it was a Hindu fort. Moreover Shahjahan was never permitted access
during interment to that part of the fort which overlooks the Taj. It is,
therefore absurd to argue that during detention he consoled himself by catching
glimpses of the Taj in the tiny glass piece.
35.
That a further absurdity and
inconsistency is; would an old monarch, bent with age, stand up all the time to
strain his bedimmed vision, and peer into a tiny glass piece with his back to
the Taj to catch a fleeting, reflected glimpse of the Taj when he could as well
have a clear, full, straight and direct view of it seated comfortably facing
the monument? And would not such a stance give him a pain in the neck? This is
yet another instance of how students of history, archaeologists and lay visitors
have never bothered or cared to take stock of the loose bits of the Taj legend,
and tried to rearrange them to find out whether they add up to at least a
coherent and cogent account, even if fictitious.
36.
That in addition to its sculptural
splendor, the Taj is also believed to have had gem studded marble screens, gold
railing, and silver doors. Readers can well add up to the cost of all these. It
will amount to a fabulous, astronomical sum. Perhaps even all the Mogul
emperors together could not have invested that much on a single monument. Had the Taj been an original tomb, Shahjahan
would never have allowed Indian flora to form the dominant feature of the
tapestry design inside the mausoleum of his wife. It is idle to argue that
because the workmen employed on the Taj happened to be Hindus their motifs got
incorporated in the Taj design. It must be remembered that it is the person who
pays the piper that calls the tune. Moreover when it is a question of the peace
of departed soul, symbols and motifs of a detested religion would never have
been allowed to be incorporated in the ornamental patterns of the Taj. In fact
the whole idea of having such a luxurious tomb built and having decorative
patterns made inside it is frowned upon in Islamic religion and tradition. But
Shahjahan had no alternative, but to put up with them, since he had taken over
a ready-made “heathen” monument.
37.
That under these circumstances, it
is expedient in the interest of justice that a facts finding committee may be
appointed for exposing the falsehood of the Arceaological department in respect
of their purported claim set-up regarding the historical blunder committed by
them in declaring Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient
buildings as Muslim monuments and truth may be disclose to the public/citizens
and students of subject of history regarding their true authorship prior to
Mughal period in furtherance of their
fundamental rights conferred under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with 49
and 51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
38. That it is prayed that this Hon’ble Court
May graciously be pleased to declare the provisions of The Ancient And
Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of
National Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and
historical monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal.
Fatehpur-sikiri, Agra Red Ford, Ethmadualla and other Monuments built by Mugal
invaders on the basis of report submitted by The Governor General, Lord
Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme
of misusing the archaeological studies as ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a),
25,26 49 And 51-A (f) (h) of constitution of India and may futher declare the
provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments and Archaeological Sites and
Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951 (71 of 1951), The
Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act, 1958 of declaring these ancient building/
monuments preserved with such identity with out any scientific inquiry/
investigation as Muslim monuments / graveyards as unconstitutional and void.
The true copy of THE ANCIENT MONUMENTS PRESERVATION ACT, 1904, The Ancient And
Historical Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of
National Importance) Act, 1951 and The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological
Sites And Remains Act, 1958 ( Act No.24 of !958) and other relevant Acts are
filed herewith and marked as Annexure No.
19, 20 and 21
39. That it is further prayed that on the
basis of the Research Conducted by the petitioner No.-2 as published in the
different books written by him as referred in earlier paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple
Place, 3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5.
Learning Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra
red Fort is a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal
is Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to
Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History Published
by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol Bagh,
New Delhi-110005, the truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions and
temperaments to the General Citizen/ Students of history by conducting the
research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by the Central
Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient
archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like demolition of disputed
structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass destruction of the
public property shacking of public confidence in Rule Of Law in the society.
The true copy of the representation submitted to the respondent No. 1 on the
basis of the reserch work conducted by Sri P. N. Oak having legal interpretation
to the legal right conffered to the citizen having scientific and analytcial
approach regarding Hindu authorship of monuments is filed as Annexure No. 22
40.
That it is further prayed that A
writ , order, directions in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities after due Scientific investigation and facts finding inquiry
report, the respondents in particular the Archaeological Survey of India to
Declare and Notify in terms of the true history, as the Taj Mahal was not built
by Shahalahan and thereby directing the Archaeological Survey of India to
remove the notices displayed by them in the Taj Mahal premises crediting
Shahjahan as its creator to desist from writing / publishing / proclaiming /
propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj Mahal and stop
and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays or any other
day in the week.
41.
That it is further prayed that a
writ, order, direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent
authorities in particular Archaeological Survey of India to open the locked-up
upper and lower portions of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal with numbers
of rooms, to remove all bricked up walls build later and look into room
therein, to investigate scientifically and certify which of those or both
cenotaphs are fake to look for a subterrance storey below the river bank ground
level, to look into after removing the room-entrance directly beneath the
basement cenotaph-chamber. by removing the brick and lime barricade flocking
the doorway, to look for important historical evidence such as idols and
inscriptions hidden inside the Shahjahan’s orders.Recitiation of name in the
west-flank building be banned because that building is part of a temple complex.The
water in the 7 storeyed well, inside the tower near the so-called mosque, be
drained to for drained to look for historical evidence (such as Court jewels
idols and inscription jettisoned when Shahjahan’s troops stormed the premises
to plunder the Shiv Shrine).Free entry on Fridays should be discontinued to
prevent loss of revenue to the Government .If free entry on Friday is allowed
to continue then free entry on Mondays should be ordered because Mondays are
Shiv worship days.
42.
That the petitioners has no other
efficacious remedy , expect to file the present Writ Petition on the following
and other grounds:-
Grounds
A.
Because truth will not make
us rich, but it will certainly make us free. The wrong historical data leads to
the horror, as we have seen during the period of demolition of the Babri
Masjid. There has been number of concomitant given by the respective community
representing to the follower of two prominent religions, but the loss that we
have suffered in the shape of hatred between the two section of the society,
cannot be compensated without revealing the truth. Unfortunately, the term
Hindu communalism is more exaggerated by the fanaticism under the garb of
secularism, while the Hindu community as a whole has always been receptive to
all the religion.
B.
Because Article 25 of the
constitution in India secures to every person, subject of course to public
order, health and morality and other provisions of Part III, including Article
17 freedom to entertain and exhibit outward acts as well as propagate and
disseminate such religious belief according to his judgement and conscience for
edification of others. The right of the State to impose such restrictions as are
desired or found necessary on grounds of public order, health, and morality is
inbuilt in Arts. 25 and 26 itself. Article 25(2)(b) ensures the right of the
State to make a law providing for social welfare and reforms besides throwing
open of Hindu religious institutions of a public character to classes and
sections of Hindus and any such rights of State or of the communities or
classes of the society were also considered to need due regulation in the
process of harmonizing the various rights.
C.
Because every citizen of India is
fundamentally obligated to develop a scientific temper and humanism .He is
fundamentally duty bound to strive towards excellence, in all sphere of
individual and collective activity, so that the nation constantly rises to the
higher level of endeavor and achievements. Everyone, whether individually or
collectively is unquestionably under the supremacy of law. However it is true
that exaggerated devotion to the rule of benefit must not nurture fanciful
doubts or lingering suspicion and thereby destroy social defense, as the
curiosity cannot be the subject matter of fair criticism. Thus the conclusion
derived that on one hand, every citizen is having the freedom of speech and
expression so far as they do not contravene the statutory limits and may
prevail in the atmosphere with out any hindrance.
D.
Because public education is
essential for functioning of the process of popular government and to assist
the discovery of truth and strengthening the capacity of individual in
participating in decision making process .The decision making process include
the right to know also and pushing the protection beyond the primary level
betrays the bigwigs desire to keep the crippled more crippled forever. The
education of spritualism is the foundation for value based survival of human
being in a civilized society. The force and section behind civilized society
depend upon moral value; and the morality cannot be cultivated through the
falsehood of ideological barrier. Thus the children may not be required to read
such facts, which are having the foundation of falsehood.
E.
Because in Bijoe Emmanuel vs
State of Kerala (1986) 3 SCC 615, the
question raised in the aforesaid case, as to whether three children who were
faithful to “Jehovah’s witnesses” may refuse to sing our national anthem or
salute the national flag of our country despite being the student in the
school, where during morning assembly, the national anthem is sung by other
children. The circular issued by the Director of Public Instruction, Kerala
provided obligation of school children to sing the National Anthem. Thus these
children were expelled. The Hon’ble Supreme court while setting aside the
aforesaid order of expulsion of the children from the school was pleased to
examine, as to whether the children faithful to “Jehovah’s witnesses”, a
worldwide sect of Christianity may be compelled against tenets of their
religious faith duly recognized and well established all over the world which
was upheld by the highest court in United States of America, Australia and
Canada and find recognition in Encyclopedia Britannica. It was held that the
appellants truly and conscientiously believed that their religion does not
permit them to join any rituals except it them in their prayers to Jehovah,
their God. Though their religious beliefs may appear strange, the sincerity of
their beliefs is beyond question. They do not hold their beliefs idly and their
conduct is not the outcome of any perversity. The appellants have not asserted
the beliefs for the first time or out of any unpatriotic sentiments. Their
objection to sing is not just against the National Anthem of India. They have
refused to sing other National Anthems elsewhere. They are law abiding and
well-behaved children, who do stand respectfully and would continue to do so,
when National Anthem is sung. Their refusal, while so standing to join in the
singing of the National Anthem is neither disrespectful of it, nor inconsistent
with the Fundamental Duty under Article 51 A (a). Hence no action should have
been taken against them.
F.
Because the concept of
sovereignty was present from the ancient time but the sovereignty was conferred
upon an individual who is suppress the wicked and is recognized as great
resources in itself like the god of fire, air, sun, moon and religion. The
religion in the ancient time was considered as spiritualism and it was not
dependent upon any ritual ceremony, but it was considered s the knowledge in
the darkness of ignorance and injustice. The sovereignty was supposed to
promote the cause of the religion, wealth and enjoyment of life and those, who
were voluptuous, malicious, mean, and low-minded, were ruined by the
retributive justice.
G.
Because the apex court held in
RamSharan Autyanuprasi’s case 1989 (Supp.) (1) SCC 251/AIR 1989 S.C 549 , that
men’s life is inclusive of his tradition , culture and heritage and protection
of that heritage in its full measure would certainly come within the encompass
of an expanded concept of Article 21 of the Constitution
H.
Because the mankind must be
satisfied with the reasonableness within reach and the decision-making process
may belong to the knowledge of the law. Thus the reasonableness and the
rationality, legality, as well as philosophically, provide colour to the
meaning of fundamental right .The concept of equality is not doctrinaire
approach. It is a binding threat, which runs through the entire constitutional
text thus the affirmative action may be constitutionally valid and the same
cannot ignore the constitutional morality, which embraces in-itself the
doctrine of inequality. It would be constitutionally immoral to perpetuate
inequality among majority .The constitution is required to kept young energetic
and alive. The attempt be endure to expand the ambit of fundamental right. It
is said that the dignity of the ocean lies not in its fury capable of causing
destruction, but in its vast extent and depth with enormous tolerance. Thus the
wider the power, the higher the need of caution and care while exercising the
power.
I.
Because the Student/children,
the future citizens under taking the education of Indian History on the
misconception/ pattern of Anglo Saxon teaching meant for division of Indian
society on the policy of “Divide and Rule”. There is a important question posed
as to whether we have actually gain our independence or we have to under take
another journey full of animosity, aggressism on account of terrorism and
fanatic ideology a prevalent throughout the World of a particular religion.
J.
Because this writ petition is moved in
the Public Interest, for a National Cause, to establish the truth there is no
private interest or any other oblique motive, or any other personal gain. The
petitioner institution, known as Institute for Re-writing Indian History,
Thane, having registration no.F-1128 (T) is a public trust. The founder
president of the trust is Shri P.N. Oak S/o Late Shri Nagesh Krishna Oak, R/o-
Plot no. 10, Goodwill Society, Aundh, Pune.411007, who has written number of
books namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place, 3.Some
Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning Vedic
Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is a
Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is
Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to
Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian
History.
K.
Because the petitioner No. 2 is the founder
President of an Institution, namely, “ Institute for Re-writing Indian (and
World) History “. The aim and objective of that institution, which is a
registered society having register no. F-1128 (T) as the public trust under the
provision of Bombay Public Trust Act. Inter alia, is to re-discover the Indian
history. The monumental places of historical importance in their real and true
perspective having of the heritage of India.
L.
Because the ‘ research paper’ of the author on the subject that
the so-called “Taj Mahal “ is not a
monument built by an Invader Emperor in memory of his late wife but a Hindu
Shiva Temple which was converted into a love-memorial by a Invader Emperor.
M.
Because the freedom of speech and
expression is basic to indivisible from a democratic polity .It includes right
to impart and receive information. Restriction to the said right could be only
as provided in article 19(2). The old dictum let the people have the truth and
the freedom to discuss it and all will go well with the Government. It should
prevail. The true test for deciding the validity is whether it takes away or
abridges fundamental right of the citizens. If there were direct abridgement of
the fundamental right of freedom of speech and expression, the law would be
invalid.
N.
the ambit and scope of “Right to Know “ is
conferred fundamental right under Article 19 (1)(a),25 and26 read with Article
49 and 51-A(f) (h) of the Constitution of India; read with the provision of
Freedom of Information Act, 2002 .The right to get information in democracy is
recognized all throughout and it is a natural right flowing from the concept of
democracy itself. Freedom of expression may be necessarily included in the
right of information. There is no expression with out having an idea on the
subject, regarding which the expression of an individual may be given effect to
change the existing values of ideology, which are based on the notable extracts
of certain facts. An enlightening informed citizen would undoubtedly enhance
democratic values.
O.
Because the Governor General, Lord Auckland, and young lieutenant Alexander
Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of misusing the archaeological
studies. This young Cunnigham, an army engineer had no training in the
archaeological department, he wrote a lengthy letter dated September 15, 1842
suggesting archeological exploration in India. This letter is reproduced on
page no 246 Volume 7 journal of Royal Asiatic Society, London, and 1843 A.D. It
discloses that the purpose of archeological exploration in India is neither the
study; nor preservation of historical monuments, but to use archeology as the
imperial tool to create mutual dissension and resentment between Buddhists, Jains
and other Hindu with Invaders by falsely crediting all monuments to the
authorship to alien invaders while few may be labeled as that of being
constructed by Buddhist or Jain, but not by Hindus.
P.
Because it has been disclosed during the High level Committee Meeting at Paris
during the convention of United Nation Education Science and Cultural
Organisation (UNESCO) that near Anoop Talab (Pond), there has been the ancient
palatial building and the ancient cultural activities remain in existance prior
to the period of invasion by the Mughal invaders. The historian have related
them back to the existence of all such palatial building during the period of
Sikarwar, Rajput, which find support by the research were conducted Prof. Ram
Nathan historian of Rajasthan University, Jaipur and also by Dr. Pratima
Asthana, Ex Vice Chancellor of Gorakhpur University.
Q.
Because one great tragedy of Indian history
has been that while Indians remained subdued and gagged under alien domination
for over a millenium foreigners, who wielded all power in India played great
havoc with Indian history merrily destroying or distorting it at their
sweetwill either out of sheer cunning and cussedness or through their colossal
ignorance and wanton barbarism.
R.
Because that life includes all the
meaning given to a man’s life including his tradition, culture and hertiage and
protection of that heritage in its full measure squarely comes within the
encompass of the extended concept of Article 21 of the Constitution of India.
S.
Because that the Taj Mahal, is a mark of
history of hertiage and the glorious achievement of Indian Art and Archaeology,
and has to be named and recognised in its true perspective and origin as a
monument of world important must not be allowed to be the victim subject of an
“Historical fraud” as an infringement of Indian tradition and heritage if the
said monument is wrongly and falsely indentifing and reconized as a mausoleum
giving a go bye to its origin and actual creation as a Palace/Temple in
redemption of fact and restoration of history.
T.
Because the history of one’s heritage
has to be rewritten to give a true and correct account of the facts and
figures, achievements and failures, conquest end the defeat.as the Taj Mahal
was not built by the fifth generation Mugal emperor, namely, Shahjahan which is
evidently proved.
PRAYER
It is, therefore, MOST RESPECTFULLY, prayed that
this Hon’ble Court May graciously be pleased to
1.
Issue a Writ, order, direction in the
nature of mandamus by appointing a facts finding committee for exposing the
falsehood of the Arceaological department regarding the historical blunder
committed by them in respect of their purported claim set-up in declaring
Taj-Mahal, Red- fort Agra, Fatahpur –Sikiri and other ancient Hindu buildings/
monuments as Muslim monuments and restrain them from displaying the authorship
of these buildings as constructed by Sahajahan or by any mughal Invaders as
truth may be disclosed to the public/citizens and Students in Subject of
History regarding their true authorship prior to Mughal period in furtherance of their fundamental rights
conferred to the Citizens under Article 19 (1) (a), 25 and 26 read with49 and
51-A(f) (h) of Constitution of India and Freedom Of Information Act, 2002.
2.
Issue a writ, order, direction in
the nature of mandamus declaring the provisions of The Ancient And Historical
Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains (Declaration Of National
Importance) Act, 1951 to the extend of declaring the ancient and historical
monuments and other and Archaeological Sites namely Taj Mahal. Fatehpur-sikiri,
Agra Red Ford , Ethmadualla and other Monuments as built by Mugal invaders on
the basis of report submitted by Then Governor General, Lord Auckland, and
young lieutenant Alexander Cunningham conceived indigenous scheme of “Divide
and Rule” and thereby misusing the archaeological
studies, as ultravires to Article 19 (1) (a), 25,26 49 And 51-A (f)
(h)constitution of India and this Hon’ble Court may futher declare the provision of Ancient and Historical Monuments and
Archaeological Sites and Remains (Declaration of National Importance) Act, 1951
(71 of 1951), The Ancient Monuments And Archaeological Sites And Remains Act,
1958 of declaring these ancient
building/ monuments preserved with such false identity with out any scientific
inquiry/ investigation as purported Muslim monuments / graveyards as
unconstitutional and void.
3.
Issue a writ, order, direction in
the nature of mandamus on the basis of the Research Conducted by the petitioner
No.-2 as published in the different books written by him as referred in earlier
paragraphs namely 1. World Vedic Heritage, 2. The Tajmahal is a Temple Place,
3.Some Blunders of Indian Historical Research, 4. Flowers Howlers, 5. Learning
Vedic Astrology, 6. Some Missing Chapters of World History, 7. Agra red Fort is
a Hindu Building, 8.Great Britain was Hindu Land, 9. The Taj Mahal is
Tejomahalaya a Shiva Temple, 10.Who Says Akbar was Great, 11. Vedic Guide to
Health, Beauty, Longevity and Rejuvenation, 12. Islamic Havoc in Indian History
Published by-HINDI SAHITYA SADAN 2, B. D. Chambers, 10/54 D. B. Gupta Road, Karol
Bagh, New Delhi-110005, the truth may be exposed through Scientific inventions
and temperaments to the Citizen/ Students of history by conducting the
research/ excavations of the remains of Hindu monuments by the Central
Government surroundings to all such Hindu Palace/ temple and other ancient
archaeological building/ Monuments as the incidents like demolition of disputed
structure at Ayodhya may not be repeated resulting in mass destruction of the
public property shacking of public confidence under Rule Of Law in the society.
4.
Issue a writ, order, directions in the
nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities after due Scientific
investigation and facts finding inquiry report, the respondents in particular
the Archaeological Survey of India may Declare and Notify in terms of the true
history, as the Taj Mahal was not built by Shahajahan and thereby directing the
Archaeological Survey of India to remove the notices displayed by them in the
Taj Mahal premises crediting Shahjahan as its creator and to futher desist from writing / publishing /
proclaiming / propagating and teaching about Shahjahan being the author of Taj
Mahal and stop and discontinue the free entry in Taj Mahal premises on Fridays in the week.
5.
Issue a writ, order, direction in
the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities in particular
Archaeological Survey of India 1)-to open the locks of upper and lower portions
of the 4 storeyed building of Taj Mahal having numbers of rooms, 2)-to remove
all bricked up walls build later blocking such rooms therein, 3)-to investigate
scientifically and certify that which of
those or both cenotaphs are fake,4)-to look for a subterrance storey below the
river bank ground level, 5)-to look into after removing the room-entrance
directly beneath the basement cenotaph-chamber.6)- by removing the brick and
lime barricade flocking the doorway, 7)-to look for important historical
evidence such as idols and inscriptions hidden inside there by the Shahjahan’s orders as truth may not make us
rich but the same will make us free from superstitions and false propoganda of
some of fundamentalists.
6.
Any other Writ , Order or
Direction, Which this Hon’ble Court May deem fit in the circumstances of the
case
Dated-7th September
,2004 Yogesh
Kumar Saxena
Advocate, High Court
(Counsel for the Petitioner)
Chamber No.139, High court, Allahabad
No comments:
Post a Comment